Can You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing?

You can. But it requires a new set of measurements that begins with tracking the customers’ investments — not yours.

We are going about the way we measure the return on investment in social media completely backwards.

Effective social media measurement should start by turning the traditional ROI approach on its head.
That is, instead of emphasizing their own marketing investments and calculating the returns in terms of
customer response, managers should begin by considering consumer motivations to use social media and then measure the social media investments customers make as they engage with the marketers’ brands.

Handling the measurements this way makes much more sense. It takes into account not only short term
goals such as increasing sales in the next month via a social media marketing campaign, or reducing
costs next quarter due to more responsive online support forums, but also the long-term returns of
significant corporate investment in social media.

The authors show how you can implement this new kind of measurement and point to the benefits
of doing so.

Read the Full Article:

Sign in, buy as a PDF, or create an account.

8 Comments On: Can You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing?

  • Dag Holmboe | September 27, 2010

    Donna, Marek,
    This is one of the best articles I have seen on Social Media ROI. Absolutely fantastic.

    To your points about measuring the social media ROI, we created an application that really does measure the social media ROI. Our solution defines a number of return channels like brand awareness, consumer insight, support cost, and risk management. The aggregated return (in dollars) is used in the standard financial ROI formula together with the social media investment. The output is the social media ROI.

    Companies like Cisco and Vayner Media is our solution to calculate their social media ROI.

  • ggreen23 | October 6, 2010

    I thought this was a great article that presents some much needed different thinking on Social Media Marketing measurement. One should note, however, that although traditional media measurement may be considered “quaint” in today’s dynamic and complex media environment, it may lead to a more holistic approach to the measurement of social media. In general, traditional media measurement always has worked best (for all parties) when the hard science of measurement is coupled with the art of marketing and idiosyncracies of human behavior.

    For more thoughts on marketing please visit us at:

    Luminositymarketing.com

  • Paddu G | October 8, 2010

    Measuring ROI is a big issue for large corporations and brands. Typically small / medium organizations can easily find out if something (including social media) works or not; or how much should be spent. For example, how would you measure the impact / cost of Dell Hell or Comcast Sucks scenarios.

    In addition to the the traditional sales and marketing metrics, a gear amount of qualitative measures are to be applied in order to find out the effectiveness of marketing via social media channels.

    To take another example, consider Pandora. Everyone loves it; tweets it and praises it on blogs. But nobody is willing to pay.

    Unfortunately brand and big businesses want to bring everything to a number (as Wall Street does). Everything cannot be measured as black or white; there are gray shades in between.

  • Jim Crawford | October 19, 2010

    Excellent article! Two Qs:

    What about measuring ROI on social media in the B2B realm?

    Does the approach you describe apply when a Fortune 500 company’s audience is a comparatively finite number of other large enterprises?

    I see some B2Bs actively engaged in social media. Others blow right by it.

  • Alexander S Prisant | October 19, 2010

    Reading between the lines, this article elegantly raises the issue of how much bottom-line value social media can deliver.

    In the current environment, few marketers have the luxury of just looking for the “cherry “on top”. As the saying goes: “Everyone is in sales, now.” And the predominate finding in most studies to date is that social media are NOT a primary vehicle for delivering revenue.

    One has to be concerned that image-building touches previously consigned to the PR budget are now–in this challenging moment–being looked at as the core of many marketing plans.

    Is this sound business practice in a depression?

    A S Prisant/Prism Ltd.
    http://www.wordsmithwars.blogspot.com

  • Joe Buhler | October 19, 2010

    Finally, an article that supports totally what I have been urging people to understand! There has been so much material published on this topic of ROI that makes absolutely no sense, for exactly the reasons outlined here. We need a new definition of measurement criteria, as I have tweeted more times than I can remember, we don’t measure volume with a yardstick either! Also, why should more stringent criteria apply when measuring the results of social web engagement than for example to brand advertising for which much high budgets are allocated with equally limited directly measurable effect on ROI. As I have also mentioned, another question to rebut the social media ROI is to ask what’s the measurable ROI of your CEO’s salary?

  • Taariq Lewis | November 10, 2010

    An excellent piece produced by Donna and Marek. However, I am curious about one of the key points of the piece. In the 2nd para, the team shares that “managers should begin by considering consumer motivations to use social media.” I think this is an excellent perspective for marketing service agencies working with large brands that have sufficiently high volume of customer activities which articulate clear customer motivations. The Starbucks example, in the piece, is an excellent case study in observing these motivations. However, what about the thousands of companies that don’t have consumer populations that can create mentions every eight seconds in a day? How are those companies to identify the motivations of their customers with such small sample sizes?

    At Terametric (http://www.terametric.com), we understand that there is a correlation between inbound customer activity and outbound marketing activities. Our customers tell us that they struggle to understand how to maximize Social Media Marketing ROI through the numerous possible channels in Social Media. It’s our view that only by benchmarking against a competitive set in a specific Social Media Channel, will companies with small customer sizes understand what inbound activities are successful and leading the impact for customer wins in sales, customer service, and other customer engagement. It would seem that without high volumes of transactions, Social Media Marketers seeking improved ROI need other options on which they can depend. Isn’t this a critical issue as well?

  • Bruce Kasanoff | November 16, 2011

    Agree completely with the need for reliable metrics, but want to add the caveat that measuring ROI won’t grow your business, won’t make your firm more innovative, won’t delight your customers. It simply allows you to understand what’s working.

    The hardest part of assessing how fast customer expectations are changing and figuring out ways to stay ahead of them. Most managers have trouble understanding what’s possible in the sense of product and service development. I finally resorted to writing very short, highly plausible science fiction stories, to inspire executives and entrepreneurs:

    http://nowpossible.com/

Add a comment