Companies often focus on creating organizational processes and structures that allow them to learn quickly. But recent research shows that organizations must also effectively manage how they forget. The authors present a new construct for companies to determine how best to remember the knowledge they should and forget the knowledge they shouldn’t. According to them, forgetting can be categorized along two dimensions. The first differentiates between accidental and intentional forgetting. The former is most often associated with the loss of valuable knowledge, which thus reduces a company’s competitiveness. Intentional forgetting, on the other hand, can benefit an organization by helping to rid it of knowledge that has been producing dysfunctional outcomes. The other dimension highlights the difference between knowledge that is entrenched versus new. The two dimensions form a matrix that categorizes the four types of organizational forgetting: 1. memory decay, 2. failure to capture, 3. unlearning and 4. avoiding bad habits. Each form is associated with a distinct set of processes and contexts that result in a specific set of challenges. As such, each of the four processes must be managed differently.
1. C. Fiol and M. Lyles, “Organizational Learning,” Academy of Management Review 10, no. 4 (1985): 803–813; B. Levitt and J.G. March, “Organizational Learning,” Annual Review of Sociology 14 (August 1988): 319–340; and A.S. Miner and S.J. Mezias, “Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research,” Organization Science 7, no. 1 (1996): 88–99.
2. M. Douglas, “How Institutions Think” (Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1986).
3. R.M. Cyert and J.G. March, “A Behavioral Theory of the Firm” (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963); and R.R. Nelson and S.G. Winter, “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change” (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982).
4. P. Martin de Holan and N. Phillips, “Organizational Forgetting,” in M. Easterby-Smith and M.A. Lyles (eds.), “The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management” (Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 2003), 393–409.
5. E. Darr, L. Argote and D. Epple, “The Acquisition, Transfer and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises,” Management Science 41, no. 11 (1995): 1,750–1,762.
6. N. Dixon, “The Neglected Receiver of Knowledge Sharing,” Ivey Business Journal 66, no. 4 (2002): 35–40; and D. Leonard and S. Sensiper, “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation,” California Management Review 40, no. 3 (1998): 112–132.
7. O. Martinez, “El Banco Central se Meuve: Modificación en la Carta Orgánica y Control de Cambios,” Clarín, Friday, Jan. 4, 2002, Sección Economia.
8. I. Nonaka, “The Knowledge-Creating Company,” Harvard Business Review 69 (November–December 1991): 96–104.
9. B. Hedberg, “How Organizations Learn and Unlearn,” in “Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol 1,” eds., P.C. Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981), 3–27; and R. Bettis and C.K. Prahalad, “The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension,” Strategic Management Journal 16, no. 1 (1995): 5–14.
10. T. Peters, “Liberation Management: Necessary Disorganization for the Nanosecond Nineties” (New York: Knopf, 1992).