Advertisement

Executive Adviser

Innovation

The Path to Developing Successful New Products

By Mike Gordon, Chris Musso, Eric Rebentisch and Nisheeth Gupta

November 30, 2009

Businesses with the best track records do three things better than their less-successful peers

This article is free to subscribers. Subscribe today.


Is your company finding it hard to develop new products? If so, you might try learning from the masters.

We found—after surveying more than 300 employees at 28 companies across North America and Europe—that the businesses with the best product-development track records do three things better than their less-successful peers: They create a clear sense of project goals early on, they nurture a strong project culture in their workplace, and they maintain close contact with customers throughout a project’s duration.

The teams in our study that embraced these tactics were 17 times as likely as the laggards to have projects come in on time, five times as likely to be on budget, and twice as likely to meet their company’s return-on-investment targets.

While we focused on companies in the automotive, high-tech and medical-device industries, we believe that product makers of all stripes could benefit from our work.

Here is a closer look at what we found:

Keep It Focused

Whenever project requirements were clearly defined and communicated to teams before kickoff, the project had a greater chance of success.

In our survey, 70% of the people working on high-performing projects—those that ranked in the top quarter of a performance index linking best practices to outcomes—said they had a clear view of the project’s scope from the beginning, compared with just one-third of poor performers. We found that not thinking through a project’s scope early on—say an appliance maker asks developers to design a new cooking range in the four-burner category but then later expands the project to include ranges with six burners—can create delays.

Executive Adviser

Innovations in management theory & business strategy – a collaboration with The Wall Street Journal

The teams with a clear understanding of project requirements appeared better able to make trade-offs between product performance and things like cost, time to market and project risk. Only 19% of poor performers said they had the necessary information to make those decisions.

Top performers also focused more intensely than low performers on staffing projects with the right people: 47% of the former researched employees’ skill sets before the project kicked off to ensure the project team was well-rounded. None of the low performers did.

Nurture a Project Culture

The top-performing companies in our survey also nurtured a strong project culture by making product development a priority. They made more of an

To reproduce or transmit one or more MIT Sloan Management Review articles by electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying or archiving in any information storage or retrieval system) requires written permission. To request permission, visit our online store (www.pubservice.com/msstore), call or e-mail:
Toll-free: 800-876-5764 (US and Canada)
International: 818-487-2064
E-mail: MITSMR@pubservice.com

This article was printed from MIT Sloan Management Review online: http://sloanreview.mit.edu/executive-adviser/2009-5/5153/the-path-to-developing-successful-new-products/

Add a comment

FROM THE MAGAZINE

Spring 2012: Cover Story
Innovation

Achieving Successful Strategic Transformation

How companies successfully make major changes — without sacrificing financial performance.