Home Login Search Sitemap FAQ About Us Contact Us MIT Sloan View Cart
MIT Sloan Management Review Homepage
 
 
 

Improving Knowledge Work Processes

Thomas Davenport, Sirkka Jarvenpaa and Michael Beers
Reprint 3744; Summer 1996, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 53–65

Buy this issueBuy this article E-mail this page 

Are traditional reengineering approaches appropriate for improving knowledge work processes? In a study of thirty organizations, the authors found that improvement methods for knowledge work ranged from the classical top-down approach to a more laissez-faire philosophy that allowed professionals to design and execute their own work. Companies should probably choose an intermediate approach that reflects the type of knowledge work, the organizational culture, and the project's business requirements. They must recognize that the nature of knowledge work is different from administrative and operational work and that the people who perform it resist structured approaches.

Thomas Davenport is Curtis Mathes Fellowship Professor and director of the Information Management Program at the University of Texas Graduate School of Business. Sirkka Jarvenpaa is associate professor of management science and information systems at the University of Texas Graduate School of Business. Michael Beers is a manager in Ernst & Young's Center for Business.

     
$ 6.50 Buy PDFBuy PDF What is this?
$ 12.00 Buy PDFBuy PDF and permission to copy What is this?
$ 5.50 Buy PDFBuy permission to copy from your own original What is this?
$ 6.50 Buy PDFBuy paper reprint What is this?
$ 12.00 Buy PDFBuy paper reprint and permission to copy What is this?

Academic pricing and volume discount information

 

[top] [back]

 
Free Issue
Join our e-mail list.
Click "GO" to register to receive alerts and updates.
POPULAR ARTICLES

MORE

privacy policy