Home Login Search Sitemap FAQ About Us Contact Us MIT Sloan View Cart
MIT Sloan Management Review Homepage
 
 
 

A Strategic Response to Investor Activism

Andrew J. Hoffman
Reprint 3724; Winter 1996, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 51–64

Buy this issueBuy this article E-mail this page 

How can a corporate executive balance social and economic pressures when social activists and corporate investors are the same people? This is the quandary Amoco Corporation faced when investors repeatedly filed proxy resolutions requesting adoption of the Valdez Principles, ten environmental principles developed by the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (CERES). The author describes the evolution of the relationship between CERES and Amoco. He shows how Amoco responded strategically to investor activism with corporate activism. He also discusses the three factors determining a company's response to investor activism: the firm's culture, the power and influence of the group filing the resolution, and the political climate in which the resolution is filed. Ultimately, responding to investor activism becomes an important aspect of integrating political strategy into competitive strategy.

Andrew J. Hoffman is visiting assistant professor of organizational behavior and Environmental Council postdoctoral fellow at the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

     
$ 6.50 Buy PDFBuy PDF What is this?
$ 12.00 Buy PDFBuy PDF and permission to copy What is this?
$ 5.50 Buy PDFBuy permission to copy from your own original What is this?
$ 6.50 Buy PDFBuy paper reprint What is this?
$ 12.00 Buy PDFBuy paper reprint and permission to copy What is this?

Academic pricing and volume discount information

 

[top] [back]

 
Free Issue
Join our e-mail list.
Click "GO" to register to receive alerts and updates.
POPULAR ARTICLES

MORE

privacy policy