Home Login Search Sitemap FAQ About Us Contact Us MIT Sloan View Cart
MIT Sloan Management Review Homepage
 
 
 

The Art of Making Change Initiatives Stick

Michael A. Roberto and Lynne C. Levesque
Reprint 46410; Summer 2005, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 53-60

Buy this issueBuy this article E-mail this page 

Too many managers are burned out on strategic change. They have lived through the scenario in which the CEO announces a bold initiative designed to dramatically lift performance. The initiative calls for sweeping changes in the company's processes, systems and culture; it unfolds with great fanfare and large resource investments. Later, managers look back and wonder what went wrong. Even when there are some short-term gains, it's common for the organization to slip back into old ways of doing things. Employees typically dismiss the initiative as just another "flavor of the month" exercise.

This article argues for a system that enables change initiatives to stick. The authors use a detailed case study (a large clothing retailer disguised as "Apparelizm Corp.") to demonstrate what it takes to produce sustainable changes in processes, behavior or performance. The study uncovered four critical processes — chartering, learning, mobilizing and realigning — that pave the way for successful institutionalization of a strategic change initiative. The elements rely much more on an understanding of the mix of task-related, emotional and behavioral factors than is fashionable in today's metrics-driven environment.

The article also highlights the study's divergence from conventional wisdom about programmatic change. Whereas most prior research has emphasized early articulation of a sense of urgency, the authors found that managers need to set in motion a series of processes right at the start if widespread changes are to stick. They must reshape the organizational structure, demonstrate that processes are fair and legitimate, and employ a range of open approaches to engage people's emotions if they want strategic initiatives to become more than the latest flavor of the month.

Michael A. Roberto is a professor in the General Management unit at Harvard Business School and author of Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer: Managing for Conflict and Consensus (Wharton School Publishing, 2005). Lynne C. Levesque is a senior researcher at Harvard Business School. Contact them at mroberto@hbs.edu and llevesque@hbs.edu.

   
$6.50Buy PDFBuy PDF What is this?
$12.00Buy PDFBuy PDF and permission to copy What is this?
$5.50Buy PDFBuy permission to copy from your own original What is this?
$6.50Buy PDFBuy paper reprint What is this?
$12.00Buy PDFBuy paper reprint and permission to copy What is this?

Academic pricing and volume discount information

 

[top] [back]

 
Free Issue
Join our e-mail list.
Click "GO" to register to receive alerts and updates.
POPULAR ARTICLES

MORE

privacy policy