|
| ||||||
|
The full text of this article is available free to all site visitors, compliments of IBM, as part of our ongoing Business Insight series. Jointly produced by MIT Sloan Management Review and The Wall Street Journal, Business Insight offers fresh thinking on crucial management issues supplemented by the deep knowledge of related, classic SMR articles, of which this is one. Read the Business Insight article to which it relates and other SMR classics on the topic, all free full text. |
Contraria Don’t Confuse Reputation With Brand
Reprint 49213;
Winter 2008,
Vol. 49, No. 2,
pp. 19-21
The full text of this article is available free to all site visitors, compliments of IBM, as part of our ongoing Business Insight series. Jointly produced by MIT Sloan Management Review and The Wall Street Journal, Business Insight offers fresh thinking on crucial management issues supplemented by the deep knowledge of related, classic SMR articles, of which this is one. Read the Business Insight article to which it relates and other SMR classics on the topic, all free full text.
Many executives speak about corporate reputation and brand as if they are one and the same. They are not, and confusing the two can be costly — a lesson which companies like Nike Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. have learned the hard way. Focusing on reputation at the expense of brand can lead to product offerings that languish in the market. However, concentrating on brand and neglecting reputation can be equally dangerous, resulting in a lower stock price, difficulties in attracting top talent and even product boycotts. Richard Ettenson is an associate professor and the Kieckhefer Fellow of Global Marketing and Brand Strategy at the Thunderbird School of Global Management in Glendale, Arizona. Jonathan Knowles is the founder and CEO of Type 2 Consulting, based in New York. Comment on this article or contact the authors through smrfeedback@mit.edu. Academic pricing and volume discount information
|
|