Advertisement

The Magazine

Management of Information Systems, Operations Management and Research

A Matrixed Approach to Designing IT Governance

By Peter Weill and Jeanne W. Ross

January 15, 2005

Throughout an organization, individuals make decisions daily that influence the need for and the value received from information technology. A simple one-page framework can help companies allocate IT decision rights and accountabilities so that individual IT decisions align with strategic objectives.

Upgrade to premium to get access to all articles.

Share This

Every enterprise engages in IT decision making, but each differs considerably in how thoughtfully it defines accountability and how rigorously it formalizes and communicates decision-making processes. Without formal IT governance, individual managers are left to resolve isolated issues as they arise, and those individual actions can often be at odds with each other. Our study of almost 300 enterprises around the world suggests that IT governance is a mystery to key decision makers at most companies. On average, just one in three senior managers knows how IT is governed at his company. (See “About the Research,” p. 28.) In this case, ignorance is definitely not bliss. When senior managers take the time to design, implement, and communicate IT governance processes, companies get more value from IT.

While the research did not identify a single best formula for governing IT, one thing is abundantly clear: Effective IT governance doesn’t happen by accident. Top-performing enterprises carefully design governance. In those companies, managers at all levels throughout the enterprise apply that design as they make daily decisions about the use of IT. Further, 60% to 80% of senior executives in those companies have a clear understanding of and can describe their IT governance. In fact, senior management awareness of IT governance is the single best indicator of its effectiveness.

The effectiveness of an enterprise’s or business unit’s IT governance can be assessed by evaluating how well it enables IT to deliver on four objectives: cost-effectiveness, asset utilization, business growth and business flexibility. Our research, which weighed each factor according to its relative importance to each company, showed that governance performance varies significantly across enterprises in an approximately bell-shaped distribution. (See “Assessing IT Governance Performance,” p. 29.) According to this measure, high IT governance performance correlated with the achievement of other desired measures of success. For example, companies that effectively govern information technology garner profits that are 20% higher than those of other companies pursuing similar strategies.1 They also achieve higher returns on equity and growth in market capitalization.

Although it cannot be concluded that superior governance performance causes superior financial performance, it can definitely be said that the two measures correlate quite well. It is certainly plausible that the two are linked. Effective governance aligns IT investments with overall business priorities, determines who makes the IT decisions and assigns accountability for the outcomes. IT is inextricable from other key enterprise assets

To reproduce or transmit one or more MIT Sloan Management Review articles by electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying or archiving in any information storage or retrieval system) requires written permission. To request permission, visit our online store (www.pubservice.com/msstore), call or e-mail:
Toll-free: 800-876-5764 (US and Canada)
International: 818-487-2064
E-mail: MITSMR@pubservice.com

This article was printed from MIT Sloan Management Review online: http://sloanreview.mit.edu/the-magazine/2005-winter/46208/a-matrixed-approach-to-designing-it-governance/

Add a comment

FROM THE MAGAZINE

Spring 2012: Cover Story
Innovation

Achieving Successful Strategic Transformation

How companies successfully make major changes — without sacrificing financial performance.