Advertisement

The Magazine

Managing Collaboration, MIT Authors

Best Practices for Industry-University Collaboration

By Julio A. Pertuzé, Edward S. Calder, Edward M. Greitzer and William A. Lucas

June 26, 2010

Universities can be major resources in a company’s innovation strategy. But to extract the most business value from research, companies need to follow these seven rules.

This article is free to subscribers. Subscribe today.


Most previous studies of industry-university collaboration have framed the analysis of such partnerships in terms of research project outcomes, defined here as a result that creates an opportunity for a company, such as guidance for the direction of technology development. From a business standpoint, however, research outcome is of only incidental importance. What matters is not outcome but impact — how the new knowledge derived from a collaboration with a university can contribute to a company’s performance. Are new products made possible? New and more effective manufacturing processes? Novel kinds of computer hardware or software that enable greater logistical efficiencies? Patentable materials, designs or processes that enhance competitive advantage?

Managers see working with academia as beneficial only to the extent that it advances the company toward its goals. The focus of our research, therefore, was on the impact of the collaboration on company products, processes or people, as evaluated both by the direct industry managers of university projects and by senior technical personnel with a view across projects. While constructing industry-university agreements is an important, and often lengthy, precursor to the collaboration, this article is concerned with specifically how those collaborations can best be carried out once the agreements are in place. In particular, we sought to determine, in a measurable way, “best practices” for the selection process — the management and the development of relationships that enable a company to capitalize on a research partnership with a university.

The Leading Question

How can companies best achieve competitive impact from industry-university research collaborations?

Findings
  • There is an outcome-impact gap in university collaborations: Promising outcomes of university projects often fail to translate into tangible impacts for the companies involved.
  • Seven best practices can bridge this outcome-impact gap.

To identify these best practices, we surveyed more than 100 projects at 25 multinational companies that engage in research collaborations with a broad base of universities; a dozen of those projects involved collaboration with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (See “About the Research.”) We targeted companies with substantial experience that allowed us to tap the accumulated knowledge of experienced managers in companies with successful track records in utilizing university research.

About the Research >>


More from MIT Authors »

To reproduce or transmit one or more MIT Sloan Management Review articles by electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying or archiving in any information storage or retrieval system) requires written permission. To request permission, visit our online store (www.pubservice.com/msstore), call or e-mail:
Toll-free: 800-876-5764 (US and Canada)
International: 818-487-2064
E-mail: MITSMR@pubservice.com

This article was printed from MIT Sloan Management Review online: http://sloanreview.mit.edu/the-magazine/2010-summer/51416/best-practices-for-industry-university-collaboration/

3 comments on “Best Practices for Industry-University Collaboration”

  1. As you say, nothing new in these 7 (why not 6 ?) good practices…
    - however, I am surprised that geo. proximity is so unimportant. I’d like to know more on this
    - firms & universities should much better develop effective innovation projects, correct ?
    -it is OK to reference non-MIT authors..
    - you may want to read the forthcoming best seller http://www.sciencetobusiness.ch
    best
    Georges Haour

  2. One thing I am surprised that the research revealed nothing about is the university side of the transaction. Many times it is the academic reward template that sees university-based investigators deviating from the interests of industry clients. This could be a selection issue, given that the study only targeted firm-based project managers. There is a lot more to learn from the management practices of university-industry centers (e.g., NSF IUCRCs, ERCs), which are incorrectly characterized in the article as government-mediated university-industry interactions. While programs like those at the NSF provide funding, it is up to the investigators to recruit and retain industry members and to develop joint projects (or lose agency support).

Add a comment

FROM THE MAGAZINE

Spring 2012: Cover Story
Innovation

Achieving Successful Strategic Transformation

How companies successfully make major changes — without sacrificing financial performance.