MIT Sloan Management Review

Business Ethics and Public Policy, Marketing

 

Rethinking Consumer Boycotts

By Richard Ettenson, N. Craig Smith, Jill Klein and Andrew John

July 1, 2006

INTELLIGENCE: New developments, research and ideas in management

Last September, executives from Arla Foods amba, the Danish dairy giant, probably paid scant attention to a series of caricatures of the prophet Muhammad in the Danish newspaper Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten. Six months later, they learned a hard lesson about religion and commerce. Arla executives watched their annual sales in the Middle East not just drop from US$430 million but virtually vanish. How did a company from Denmark, a country not exactly known for triggering international controversy, find itself at the center of a geopolitical, religious and commercial maelstrom? The answer extends beyond sales of Danish butter in Saudi Arabia. Based on our decade-long program of research studying global consumer boycotts, we offer five key lessons from these recent events.

First, when executives think about consumer protests, they focus mostly on company- specific boycotts triggered by a corporate policy or action, such as the use of sweatshop labor in developing countries. But, as Arla discovered, boycotts can also be touched off by broad geopolitical, religious or even historical tensions. In such societal boycotts, the company can be far removed from the root cause of the backlash (see “Different Kinds of Consumer Protests”).

Second, not all consumer protests are always boycotts. Consider, for example, certain new brands that have leveraged themselves as products of conscience to Muslim consumers, such as the United Arab Emiratesbased Mecca-Cola... To read the complete article, login or sign-up using the form below.

 
 

In This Issue

 

Best Sellers