Why Managers Still Matter

In today’s knowledge-based economy, managerial authority is supposedly in decline. But there is still a strong need for someone to define and implement the organizational rules of the game.

Reading Time: 20 min 

Topics

Permissions and PDF

We live in a knowledge-based, rapidly changing, networked world. A supposed hallmark of the new economy has been the decline of managerial authority. Modern organizations such as online retailer Zappos have come to favor flat hierarchies with widely distributed authority. We call such businesses “wikified companies,” using the wiki– prefix to denote the loosely structured, bottom-up, egalitarian structure popularized by the Wikipedia encyclopedia project and touted by management thinkers and consultants.1

“Wikifying” the modern business has become a call to arms for some management scholars and pundits. As Tim Kastelle, a leading scholar on innovation management at the University of Queensland Business School in Australia, wrote: “It’s time to start reimagining management. Making everyone a chief is a good place to start.”2

Companies, some of which operate in very traditional market sectors, have been crowing for years about their systems for “managing without managers”3 and how market forces and well-designed incentives can help decentralize management and motivate employees to take the initiative.4 For example, in the 1980s, Johnsonville Sausage, based in Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin, made a big point of slashing managerial oversight and putting quality control, personnel management, customer relations and even business expansion in the hands of worker-managed teams. As CEO Ralph Stayer explained, “My job … was to put myself out of a job.”5

The Industrial Revolution brought the decline of small-scale, cottage production and the rise of large, integrated businesses; Adam Smith’s invisible hand was replaced with what business historian Alfred D. Chandler Jr. famously described as the “visible hand” of management.6 But now that pendulum appears to be swinging in another direction. What Frederick W. Taylor, a pioneer in the field of scientific management in the late 19th century, saw as rigidly organized factories of docile and obedient workers has been eclipsed by loosely structured teams of highly trained and empowered knowledge workers.7 Indeed, the “visible hand” of management has morphed into a system of loose networks, virtual businesses and peer-to-peer interactions.8

This isn’t to say that strong-minded managers have become extinct.

Topics

References (27)

1. See, for example, D. Tapscott and A.D. Williams, “Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything” (New York: Penguin, 2006).

2. T. Kastelle, “Hierarchy Is Overrated,” November 20, 2013, http://blogs.hbr.org.

Show All References

Reprint #:

56110

More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comment (1)
Norris Krueger
Good points here, gents... from the entrepreneurial perspective, we are seeing at least the illusion of managers behaving (and thinking) very differently. However, if you peek behind the curtain there are still no shortage of entrepreneurs who manage from a Theory X perspective... and even more "new school", collaborative managers who are.. well... not very good at it. It's hard to stay collaborative when the stuff hits the fan - but we need to get better at the skills of managing.

But dare I ask... are b-schools really training for this? Or just bathing us in platitudes?
undefined