Bank Bashing, Courtesy of a Banker

Reading Time: 2 min 


Lawrence K. FishTwo of us at MIT Sloan Management Review grabbed good seats at yesterday’s MIT Sloan campus-event headliner: a downwind reflection on fallout from the financial crisis. Featured attraction: a high-level round of bank bashing, with a high-level banker on hand to help do it. OK, it wasn’t only banks that were bashed. Ungenerous attention was paid to politicians, insurance firms, mortgage companies, and the general ethical standards of business people, as well. The usual suspects, in other words.

Simon JohnsonBut the hall was overstuffed because the two speakers were not usual: a candid Lawrence K. Fish, longtime (now former) Citizen’s Bank CEO, and, as his interlocutor, MIT Sloan prof Simon Johnson, the former IMF chief economist and co-founder of acclaimed global economy blog The Baseline Scenario. The conversation was part of the Dean’s Innovative Leader Series. Along with heat, it generated a fair quotient of light. Plus some activist heckling.

We’ll post an edited version of the entire chat in weeks ahead, but for now, some brief highlights:


Note, first, the past tense. “It was really bad,” said Fish, “but we’re coming out of it.” TARP has actually helped, and the government will end up ahead, he said. “The returns will probably mean that the government will make money.”

Will a crisis happen again? “Yes.”


“I’m worried we’ll overreact,” Fish said. “We need better regulation, not more regulation.” Two big risks: “One, competitiveness globally [of the U.S. financial services industry]; and two, we may protect consumers so well that consumers can’t borrow.”

Johnson argued for aggressive reforms (see his blog), but Fish thinks that’s a nonstarter. “Profound regulatory reform—of the kind Simon is talking about—is probably a political unreality” because the financial services lobbies are too good and donate too much money to be countered.


“There are no B-pluses in ethics, it’s pass/fail,” said Fish. And it’s not hard to assess the grade. “You know what’s right. You know.”

He added for illustration: “It makes me crazy that someone gets a $100 million bonus.


More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comments (3)
Improvisations » The Financial Crisis Fallout Explained — on Video « MIT Sloan Management Review
[...] Friday we offered selected pearls from a great conversation between banking honcho Larry Fish and MIT Sloan economist (and leading financial .... [...]
Michael S. Hopkins
Alas, no. The conversation didn't get that prescriptive about bonuses. But we'll definitely explore the question in the fuller interview with Fish that's to come.

One place the talk DID get prescriptive was when a question was asked about how big banks should be allowed to get. (That is, what's the biggest a bank could become without being "too big to fail"--and thus, "too big not to bail out at considerable expense to taxpayers.")

Fish didn't have a number in mind, but Johnson did: "$100 billion" in assets, he said, a number which represents major shrinkage from the $600-$700 billion that even some investment banks held. Which is to say: small. Johnson's quoting of that number is what prompted Fish's observation that "profound regulatory a political unreality."
Jimmy Guterman
They talked about how the current bonus system didn't work. Did they say banks what _should_ do about bonuses?