At MIT Sloan Management Review (MIT SMR) we explore how leadership and management are transforming in a disruptive world. We help thoughtful leaders capture the exciting opportunities — and face down the challenges — created as technological, societal, and environmental forces reshape how organizations operate, compete, and create value.
We distribute our content on the web, in print, in audio podcast, and in apps, as well as via licensees and libraries around the world.
The team.
Editorial advisory board.
Careers.
Policies.
Editorial Mission
MIT Sloan Management Review leads the discourse about advances in management practice among influential thought leaders in business and academia. We equip our readers with evidence-based insights and guidance to innovate, operate, lead, and create value in a world being transformed by technology and large-scale societal and environmental forces.
Relationship to MIT
MIT Sloan Management Review is a media entity wholly owned by MIT but editorially independent from it. Organizationally, we sit within the MIT Sloan School of Management, and we align with its mission to develop principled, innovative leaders who improve the world and to generate ideas that advance management practice.
MIT Sloan Management Review is governed by the same integrity and commitment to excellence as other departments and programs at MIT. We benefit from the school’s extensive resources, including direct access to its world-renowned faculty, researchers, and thought leaders in management and technology. Our unique position within the MIT ecosystem allows us to tap into cross-disciplinary insights from one of the world’s leading institutions for business education and technology research.
While we maintain close ties with MIT Sloan, our coverage of management theory and practice remains independent. We are not part of the school’s communications function; our mission is to identify and publish the most groundbreaking ideas in management practice, regardless of their source, while maintaining the rigorous intellectual standards that MIT represents.
Use of Generative AI
We expect authors who use AI tools in the research or writing of a manuscript, or in the production of images or graphical elements of the paper, to be transparent in disclosing how it was used. Authors are fully responsible for confirming the accuracy of the work and for the use of proper citation in their manuscripts.
Our articles are always edited by human editors, though we may use generative AI as a tool in parts of our process, such as generating draft summaries and article metadata. This work is managed by human editors, who are accountable for the final work.
We may also use generative AI to produce content that we couldn’t otherwise provide to our readers — for instance, to create translations or audio versions of our articles or to spin off content in different formats, such as visual presentations. In such cases, we will always tell readers how the work was created, and such efforts will always have human oversight.