5 Reasons Why Government Should Spend More on Innovation

The article “Innovate Better” by Fareed Zakaria in the June 13 issue of Time magazine looks at the state of business innovation in the U.S. and concludes it needs more help.

Reading Time: 1 min 


Already a member?
Not a member?
Sign up today

5 free articles per month, $6.95/article thereafter, free newsletter.


Unlimited digital content, quarterly magazine, free newsletter, entire archive.

Sign me up

The article “Innovate Better” by Fareed Zakaria in the June 13 issue of Time magazine looks at the state of business innovation in the U.S., and cites these stats and opinions:

1. Using “hard measures such as spending on research, patents and venture funding,” the U.S. doesn’t even make the top five countries internationally: according to a Boston Consulting Group report, the U.S. ranks eighth, and according to the Innovation Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITTF) it ranks sixth.

2. In a ranking of “how much a company has improved its innovation capacity from 1999 to 2009, factoring in measures like government funding for basic research, education and corporate tax policies,” the U.S. was ranked No. 40 — out of 40, according to the ITIF rankings.

3. Even though sometimes just “novel business ideas” are enough, lots of innovation requires new technology. (About those novel ideas, writes Zakaria: “Len Baker, one of the founding fathers of the Silicon Valley venture-capital industry, says, ‘My favorite example is Isaac Merritt Singer, who invented the first commercially successful sewing machine. The real benefit to society was that he was the first person to sell to women, because prior to this it was assumed that women couldn’t operate machinery. His company invented the installment plan and the trade-in. That’s innovation.’”)

4. The “ecosystem” that encourages technology development needs, Zakaria writes, “great universities, vibrant companies that devote time and energy to research and – yes – large amounts of government funding. The latter may be a controversial topic in theory, but in practice, the rise of technology was clearly fueled by government.”

5. “In the rest of the world, the role of the state is not controversial.” Zakaria cites South Korea’s development of iron and steel and shipbuilding capabilities, and China’s government-supported lead in solar panels, wind turbines, and high-speed rail (see Honqiao Railway Station, below).

A CNN television special of Zakaria interviewing top innovation experts including venture capitalist Len Baker; director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Regina Dugan; author of Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation Steven Johnson; and Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt will be on CNN on Saturday, June 11;

Read the Full Article


More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comments (2)
Siswanto Gatot
the innovation is the key to achieve outstanding economics performance. the future economics is based on innovation and "uncommon idea". since the spending for innovation is not cheap, government has obligation to finance it
There are lots of reasons why Government should spend more on innovation, and in theory more spending should be advantageous to the overall economy as well as the individual inventor or host company.

But how do you get the government money to actually be spent towards meaningful innovation?

Many times the spending process is a real farce with the people receiving the money for innovation being those that are most committed to mastering the process for qualifying and spending enough time to get through the process.

The question should not be should the government spend more, its more about how do you get funds into the right hands, or hand that are more likely to yield some type of positive societal and/or economic benefit?