Rethinking Outsourcing as Energy Costs Rise

Reading Time:

Topics

Like what you’re reading?
Join our community
Member
Free

5 free articles per month, $6.95/article thereafter, free newsletter.

Subscribe
$89 $45/Year

Unlimited digital content, quarterly magazine, free newsletter, entire archive.

Sign me up

According to a June 13th article in The Wall Street Journal, some companies are starting to reexamine their decision to outsource production to China — because rising oil costs make the transportation of goods across the globe more expensive.

That’s a phenomenon Michael J. Mol might call a shift of the outsourcing curve. Mol, a senior lecturer at the University of Reading Business School, suggests in his book Outsourcing: Design, Process and Performance (discussed in the forthcoming Summer 2008 issue of MIT Sloan Management Review) that, if you could graph the relationship between a company’s possible outsourcing levels (on a horizontal axis) and the resulting business performance (on a vertical axis), the graph would look something like an upside-down U — at some optimum point the organization is outsourcing an ideal amount, at the high point of the curve, where the performance benefits are maximized. Outsource too much or too little — and the company’s resulting performance is farther down the curve and less than optimal.

But, Mol notes in his book, things like changes in transportation costs can shift a company’s outsourcing curve. And, when a company’s outsourcing curve shifts the business’s optimal level of outsourcing will change.

Case in point.

 

Topics

More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.