Rethinking Procurement in the Era of Globalization

What used to be a matter of finding and purchasing goods and services at the most favorable price has changed. At some companies, procurement has become closely intertwined with strategic decision making and board policy at the highest levels of the organization.

Reading Time: 14 min 

Topics

Buy
Like what you're reading?
Join our community
Member
Free

5 Free Articles per month, $6.95/article thereafter. Free newsletter.

Subscribe
$89 $44/Year

Unlimited digital content, quaterly magazine, free newsletter, entire archive.

Sign me up

Over the past 25 years, the role of procurement within companies has changed dramatically from that of simply buying goods and services to overseeing an integrated set of management functions. Procurement has crept into every aspect of management, from category management to managing supplier relationships, contracts and payments, and strategy. As companies look beyond short-term costs and the scope of procurement-related issues has grown, procurement professionals are paying more attention not just to what they spend on goods and services but to the broader costs of operating, maintaining and replacing the items and resources they purchase over time.

Despite procurement’s increased level of importance, it has yet to achieve the high-level recognition it deserves. There are two main reasons for this. First, it is often difficult to document procurement’s specific contributions: Were the cost savings the result of skillful negotiations with vendors or a fortuitous shift in the market? The financial benefits of a favorable procurement deal often extend beyond the initial purchase price to other aspects of performance (for example, improved working capital or reduced financing costs), so there is more than one bottom line to consider. Second, the line between the responsibilities of procurement and those of other stakeholders can be ambiguous. The result: Procurement often shares whatever successes it achieves with other groups; in failure, however, it typically gets all the blame.

The need to place procurement in a broader strategic context has become all the more pressing in the current era of increasing globalization. Global sourcing links procurement decisions to strategic decisions. “Make or buy” decisions — for example, whether to move production offshore to your own subsidiaries or outsource it to outside producers and subcontractors — are typically made at the senior executive levels. However, other important decisions (such as where to buy, from whom and under what conditions) are usually handled by procurement professionals. The reality is that these decisions are no longer based entirely on an understanding of direct purchase costs or on easily observable transaction costs, such as transport expenses and import duties, but on many other types of transaction costs as well, including those related to cultural, institutional and political differences. In this article, we will explore the role of these other transaction costs in sourcing decisions and offer a new framework for evaluating costs associated with sourcing and procurement in an increasingly globalized market.

The Role of Transaction Costs

Traditional economic theory ignored transaction costs and assumed that trade was frictionless. However, trade transactions, by their very nature, involve transaction costs.1 A necessary condition for exchange is that one can commit ex ante to being able and willing to fulfill contractual obligations ex post. Neither buyers nor sellers will enter into exchange relationships unless they are confident that the other party will fulfill the contractual obligations. The problem can be solved in different ways.2 The exchange can be defined institutionally (for example, in a legally binding contract), but it can also be defined by trust and by providing incentives for trustworthy behavior (for example, through bonding networks, where not fulfilling the contractual obligation leads to a costly exclusion from the network).

This fundamental problem of exchange triggers various types of transaction costs, which can vary based on the way the problem is solved. Practically speaking, transaction costs consist of all the costs incurred in the course of acquiring goods and services, either by exchanging property rights in a market transaction or by exchanging responsibilities: all the expenses and time spent coordinating the purchase of goods and services. The “hard” costs are relatively easy to quantify — they relate to items such as transport charges, import levies and tariffs. “Soft” costs, on the other hand, are less accessible and less clearly defined. They include the costs of creating and checking contracts, information costs, costs resulting from cultural differences and communication failures, knowledge of legal procedures, costs incurred in building trust and reputation, network building, costs associated with risk (including regulation) and security requirements.3

As distances between trading partners grow and economic, cultural, political and social systems converge in a globalized market, the soft costs become more important and procurement becomes a more strategically important area. Indeed, the ability to purchase goods or services at the lowest possible price is often less critical than developing effective ways of bridging cultural differences and overcoming informal trade barriers.4 However, transaction costs cannot be reduced by decisions of the procurement department alone. Because of the wide range of costs and their effects, it requires strategic decisions by top management. As procurement managers look beyond traditional cost considerations, top managers must define their priorities and deal with different cost categories.

Strategic Transaction Management

The ongoing trend of globalization has brought about increased movement toward specialization and fragmentation of production as manifested by growth in outsourcing, global sourcing and direct foreign investments. Dramatic growth rates in countries with lower production costs (including India and China) have given rise to a sense of urgency within companies operating internationally about how they can continue to create value through trade. One option is to switch from captive production to become a leader in orchestrating production — developing expertise regarding where to produce, assemble and sell. It requires changing the way companies go about managing transactions and how international trade relationships are established. In doing this, companies can acquire critical knowledge about how transaction costs can be reduced. In fact, it works in two ways. Lower transaction costs will enable further fragmentation of production and outsourcing of specialized tasks because they make outsourcing profitable.5 At the same time, enhanced knowledge about the costs of outsourcing (in particular, knowing when outsourcing isn’t profitable due to unexpectedly high soft transaction costs) can lead to further reductions in transaction costs.

Knowledge of transaction costs is a critical part of trade and investment decisions. It allows companies to reduce their overall costs, thereby making existing trade more profitable and opening the door to higher volumes of trade. Knowing how to keep transaction costs low is something we call transaction management. Effective transaction management can create value for both individual companies and society as a whole.

As transaction costs are reduced, they become a smaller part of the total supply cost in current trade. But there are compelling reasons for companies to remain focused on this area. Good transaction management and lower transaction costs will increase the number of profitable trade transactions and lead to further fragmentation of supply chains. In the process, production processes will undergo changes; with increased outsourcing, there will be fewer direct production costs and more transaction costs. On balance, new trade (from outsourcing more parts of the supply chain) will have higher transaction costs in relation to the total supply costs.

The strategic character of transaction management is highlighted by the fact that institutions, including the legal infrastructure, the banking system and the regulatory and political systems, are all highly influential in how transactions are managed. Different institutions shape transactions in different ways — for example, whether the transactions are handled formally (with legal contracts) or informally (through trust-based relationships). Although globalization has spurred significant convergence in the institutional environment, cultural, legal and social differences continue to be barriers in some countries and regions. For example, the trading norms that are accepted in continental Europe and the English-speaking world do not always line up with how things are done in the Middle East and Asia. For managers seeking to reduce transaction costs, understanding the cultural, legal and social differences is critical.

About the Research »

Transaction Management for Procurement

Procurement professionals have an essential role to play in managing the complex interface between companies and stakeholders to maximize value. In today’s transparent global economy, procurement managers will not only have to identify and manage the different sources of transaction costs. They will need to do this in areas where they have varying degrees of control or influence. To assist management in understanding its cost exposure, it is helpful to consider transaction costs along two dimensions: (1) in terms of objective and subjective issues and (2) in terms of internal and external influences.

Objective and Subjective Issues Objective issues are tied to measurable factors and are of a technical or professional nature. They are usually linked to financial issues such as direct costs, improved quality, on time delivery, transportation cost and life cycle cost. Subjective factors, by contrast, are related to emotional, religious or intuitive views of the world and how it connects with the organization. Although not overtly related to finance, such issues (for example, unethical business behavior, diminished confidence in a brand or adversarial labor relations) can result in significant transaction costs and have major financial implications.

Internal and External Factors By internal factors, we mean factors related to the specific business: its market position and its reputation and brand. These are distinct from external factors, which are tied to developments outside the company in areas such as regulation, labor costs and currencies.

The combinations of internal, external, objective and subjective factors create a complex spectrum of exposures that can affect the financial health of a company, if not its very existence. In a global economy, knowing the risks and opportunities of the different exposures is a critical management competence. Although management decisions will originate in many different parts of the company, procurement managers will need to keep a close eye on the various cost exposures and flag concerns as they arise. Procurement, therefore, will need to become more closely connected with strategic decisions throughout the company.

Classification of Costs in Procurement

View Exhibit

Companies strive to minimize the total cost of ownership. Based on our analysis of cost factors, the total cost of ownership consists of:

  1. The direct cost of acquisition, which is the original purchase cost
  2. The further cost, which is related to owning the equipment or business, such as installation, maintenance, energy consumption, disposal, etc.
  3. All transaction costs related to acquisition and further cost The direct cost of acquisition and the further cost are the two factors that typically drive purchase decisions. They are largely related to objective costs (as noted in “Classification of Costs in Procurement”. The first step in extending the purchaser’s decision framework is to identify transaction costs as a cost category that needs to be managed separately. The second step is to give subjective costs the same level of attention as objective costs. Finally, purchasers must acknowledge that many of the soft issues do not just operate within the decision framework of procurement but are integral to the strategic position of the company; hence they need to be addressed by a wider management group.

An alternative way to view procurement is to look at the day-to-day activities procurement professionals manage. This adds the time dimension of decision making to our objective/subjective and internal/external framework. However, it would be a mistake to conclude that the day-to-day activities will reflect the variety of transaction costs covered by our framework. In particular, procurement professionals must be prepared to address issues of accountability, optimization and compliance to ensure that transaction costs are identified and properly addressed.

Transaction Costs By Stage of Procurement

Accountability Procurement professionals need to assume accountability not only for purchasing but also for managing the complete transaction. Although procurement specialists are often familiar with various types of transaction costs, many lack a full appreciation of the effects some costs have on the overall economics.

Optimization Once the transaction costs are known, the challenge is figuring out how to optimize them in relation to the total cost of ownership. This means knowing where costs can be minimized and knowing where they are necessary to achieve optimal procurement results. For example, transaction costs may be acceptable in a situation where innovative or key strategic goods or services of very high value to the company are being procured and where security of supply is of prime importance. On the other hand, for routine or commodity goods or services, the cost is of prime importance and transaction cost will need to be avoided or minimized.

Compliance Even if transaction costs are properly identified for every stage of the procurement life cycle, their benefits may not be realized due to noncompliance during the implementation of the acquisition process. In today’s global market, compliance management is more important than ever.

Managing the Soft Side of Procurement

The importance of detailing and managing hard costs on a category-by-category basis cannot be overstated. However, a major part of the globalization challenge is figuring out how to conduct business both profitably and ethically, which requires a more comprehensive understanding of how to manage the soft issues (for example, the trade-offs between the environment and profits). Decisions to source products offshore — for example, outsourcing parts production and services — often lead to higher transaction costs than originally expected. This has implications for regional employment and economic growth because these transaction costs may affect the profitability of outsourcing and reduce economic activity. It may, moreover, lead to social unrest at home and a loss of trust in the company, which can give rise to a new set of transaction costs.

Decisions to address issues of environmental sustainability in a responsible way or to create attractive working conditions for employees may result in higher transaction costs in the short term (in the form of higher production costs or more expensive training). In the long run, however, these investments may lead to lower transaction costs (resulting from a good reputation and the ability to attract the most motivated workers). Therefore, in balancing the trade-offs between short-term and long-term costs, ethical corporate behavior can be rational. Different companies will make these decisions in different ways, depending on how they value the risk and costs of a reputation loss and how managers are emotionally or politically positioned in relation to these issues.

SENIOR MANAGERS AT global companies need to recognize that the role of procurement professionals is changing. What used to be a matter of finding and purchasing goods and services at a favorable price has become closely intertwined with strategic decision making and board policy at the highest levels of the organization. Global sourcing creates many new opportunities for value creation, which well-run companies must learn to take advantage of.

Topics

References

1. Ronald Coase, winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize for economics in 1991, introduced the concept of transaction costs in economic theory: See R.H. Coase, “The Nature of the Firm,”

Reprint #:

50117

More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comment (1)
Alice Mills
One thing to mention on the following:

'The exchange can be defined institutionally (for example, in a legally binding contract), but it can also be defined by trust and by providing incentives for trustworthy behavior...'

Nowadays, in many countries of the world there are so many "holes in laws" that none of binding contracts may help. Consequently, the first time you work with some company is always a risk. This results in case when companies become partners and prefer working with all the same companies each time, thus neither giving other starting up companies to go into business, nor looking around for other competitors, which in turn, has both good and bad sides as well. In short, starting up your own business becomes more and more difficult every day.