Topics
MIT SMR Strategy Forum
Looking at the devastating pictures and stories coming from Australia’s bushfires in these early days of a new decade, the effects that climate change is having on the planet are readily apparent — as is the devastation countries will continue to face without major course correction. While warnings about the effects of climate change have been sounded for decades, the last year has seen increasing pressure on companies and investors to enact real climate policies.
We may now be entering a watershed moment, as BlackRock’s CEO Larry Fink wrote earlier this month in his annual letter to CEOs that, “Climate change has become a defining factor in companies’ long-term prospects,” and that his company, the world’s largest asset manager, would be “exiting investments that present a high sustainability-related risk.”
For this month’s poll we surveyed our experts on the following statement:
In the wake of recent climate-related disasters and related events, such as the bankruptcy of PG&E, corporations are now planning for the increased operational risks and potential liabilities caused by climate change.
■
Raw Responses
■
Responses weighted by panelists’ level of confidence
Panelists
Panelist | Vote | Confidence | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 7 | “Some companies are doing this type of planning, while others are not.” |
|
Strongly Agree | 10 | “BlackRock‘s statement today underlines just how central climate change is becoming to the assessment of investor risk. Whether this changes behavior is, of course, another question.” |
|
Disagree | 8 | “Many companies are buying insurance and developing contingency plans, such as building partnerships for supporting the transfer of operations under emergency conditions. Yet the risks and liabilities... associated with climate change are too great for almost any company to address fully through these techniques. Innovation for prevention and risk mitigation at scale is required.”Read More + |
|
Neither Agree nor Disagree | 5 | |
|
Agree | 7 | “Clearly the answer here varies by industry and sector — but that is more an issue of degree than whether or not climatic changes are on the radar of executive teams for their implications for operati...onal risk of specific events and longer-term strategic considerations regarding the viability of certain sites, shifts in demand patterns, and need for carbon-light processes.”Read More + |
|
Agree | 8 | “Most smart corporations are certainly planning for the increased risks of climate change. Are they planning enough? Most certainly are not.” |
|
Neither Agree nor Disagree | 4 | |
|
Agree | 7 | |
|
Agree | 8 | “Regardless of politics, no profit-oriented business is going to take real risks.” |
|
Strongly Agree | 8 | “Executives with whom I work are all concerned about climate change and consider planning for it as a critical risk.” |
|
Agree | 8 | “Many corporations have been doing scenario planning for quite some time, and disaster scenarios can be a part of this activity. Heightened salience of climate issues will only increase the diffusion ...of these and other risk management practices.”Read More + |
|
Agree | 8 | “Companies are considering not only increased operational risks and potential liabilities, but also more fundamental changes to their strategies. However, this is not universal. There is a lot of vari...ation among companies in how substantially they have responded to climate-related changes to their current and future business environments.”Read More + |
|
Neither Agree nor Disagree | 5 | “If PG&E is any guide for planning ahead, our future is dark and grim.” |
|
Strongly Agree | 9 | “Most corporations were examining the effects of climate change on their operations and future five years ago. Any that weren‘t would have started by now.” |
|
Disagree | 5 | “I suspect that the majority of organizations (or people, for that matter) are still far from fully understanding what’s needed to protect themselves from extreme events. But the real issue is [what] ...we will collectively do to prevent these events in the first place.”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 9 | “Climate change-related warnings and environmental disasters have been around for more than 50 years with significant debate on if and what impact it has on economics and society. In light of this his...tory, it is questionable whether one can make blanket statements on all corporations increasing attention to operational risks and liabilities based on one or two firms‘ fates.”Read More + |
|
Agree | 9 | “It is clear that there has been a marked upward shift in concern about corporate liability for climate-related events due to, e.g., shareholder class-action lawsuits. What exactly caused that shift i...s less clear to me, but it will be an important part of law and corporate governance going forward.”Read More + |
|
Agree | 8 | “It is clear some firms are starting to plan and that this number is growing rapidly, but many corporates — particularly in emerging economies — are still ‘head in the sand.‘ At the end of the day, g...lobal emissions keep rising (even if emissions per unit of GDP is falling).”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 7 | “Climate change alters risks in many unpredictable ways — coastal flooding, travel interruption, logistic complications. Some of the risks are difficult to insure against without public coordination a...nd investment — remember the floods of New Orleans?”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 4 | “By no means do I have any expertise here, but from most of my knowledge vis-a-vis planning, these are the type of contingencies that I suspect most corporations to designate as too far removed from n...ear-term concerns, and hence, they will likely neglect these issues.”Read More + |
|
Agree | 8 | “I think large corporations are working on this. They feel pressure from various stakeholders, including some of their larger shareholders like BlackRock. I have no confidence that smaller firms on th...e competitive fringe are planning for risks created by climate change. And even the largest firms can do little about risk to shared infrastructure.”Read More + |
|
Strongly Agree | 10 | “BlackRock, the world‘s largest asset manager, stated in its annual letter to CEOs that it is putting climate change front and center in its investing strategy going forward. CDP (formerly the Climate... Disclosure Project) represents over 800 institutional investors with over $100 trillion in assets. Any companies that are not planning for climate risk at this point have their heads in the sand.”Read More + |
|
Strongly Agree | 7 | |
|
Strongly Agree | 9 | “Leading investment firms, like BlackRock, are already planning for climate change, saying they will not take on and [will] exit investments that further damage the climate or pose substantial climate...-related risks. This sends a powerful signal. There is also the perception of being a bad corporate citizen, which can irrevocably damage image and brands. Not all corporations will do so, but many will.”Read More + |
About the MIT SMR Strategy Forum
Questions of strategy are universal: Every business leader must tackle a topic that’s central to how and why organizations compete. The MIT Sloan Management Review Strategy Forum offers a regular glimpse into the minds of academic leaders who have been researching and observing how businesses determine their strategy for decades.
Each month, the MIT SMR Strategy Forum poses a single question to our panel of experts in the fields of business, economics, and management. Panelists are asked to agree or disagree with a prediction, indicate their level of confidence, and provide a brief explanation for their response.
This page allows readers to engage with the results of each survey. You can see the share of panelists who agree or disagree with each prediction, how confident they feel about their answers, and the thinking behind their responses. To explore individual panelists’ thought processes about each question, click through to their voting history page. Readers can also submit their own suggestions for future topics to smr-strategy@mit.edu.
Forum Chairs
Raffaella Sadun is a professor of business administration in the Strategy unit at Harvard Business School. Professor Sadun’s research focuses on the economics of productivity, management, and organizational change. Her research documents the economic and cultural determinants of managerial choices, as well as their implications for organizational performance in both the private and public sectors (including health care and education). She tweets @raffasadun.
Timothy Simcoe is an associate professor of strategy and innovation at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business.