Craft Schedules That Work for Everyone
Business leaders can improve retention and business performance with schedules that make sense for workers’ lives.
Tang Yau Hoong
Melanie was several months into her new job at a warehouse, and she and her partner were still trying to balance the demands of work and family. Melanie awoke at 4 a.m. each day. She used her phone’s flashlight to locate her clothes so that she wouldn’t rouse the rest of her household, which included two sons, one of whom had special needs. Her drive to work was 30 minutes, and if she was even a second late, she could be let go.
She liked the role, especially the higher pay it provided compared with her last job, but the hours were taking a toll. Upon accepting the job, she was surprised to learn that overtime was mandatory — something not uncommon for hourly workers in the industry. That meant she had to plan months in advance to attend her children’s school events, stockpiling sick time in order to leave work when she needed to. It also meant that when she was actually sick, she had to go to work anyway. She had already canceled multiple appointments with her doctor.
Get Updates on Transformative Leadership
Evidence-based resources that can help you lead your team more effectively, delivered to your inbox monthly.
Please enter a valid email address
Thank you for signing up
Her son with special needs experienced frequent challenges, which created a dilemma: Should Melanie leave work to pick him up at school when she inevitably got the call that he needed help, and lose her job? Ultimately, Melanie’s partner chose to make the sacrifice, quitting a much-loved job to better support their kids. But Melanie wondered whether she had made the wrong choice in sticking with her employer.
Melanie is a real person whose name we have changed to preserve her anonymity. She was interviewed as part of the research that one of us (Alex) conducted on the challenges facing both workers and managers employed in e-commerce fulfillment.
References
1. N. Maestas, K.J. Mullen, D. Powell, et al., “The Value of Working Conditions in the United States and the Implications for the Structure of Wages,” American Economic Review 113, no. 7 (July 2023): 2007-2047.
2. H. He, D. Neumark, and Q. Weng, “Do Workers Value Flexible Jobs? A Field Experiment,” Journal of Labor Economics 39, no. 3 (July 2021): 709-738, table 3.
3. A. Dube, S. Naidu, and A.D. Reich, “Power and Dignity in the Low-Wage Labor Market: Theory and Evidence From Wal-Mart Workers,” working paper 30441, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, September 2022, figure 8.
4. Our dimensions overlap, in part, with those proposed by Susan Lambert and Julia Henly in S.J. Lambert and J.R. Henly, “Measuring Precarious Work Schedules,” working paper, The Employment Instability, Family Well-Being, and Social Policy Network, Chicago, Illinois, November 2014).
5. H.H. Jeon, S.H. Kim, H. Song, et al., “To Each Their Own (Shifts): Incorporating Heterogeneous Worker Preferences Into Shift Work Schedules,” SSRN, April 5, 2024, https://papers.ssrn.com.
6. Z. Ton, “QuickTrip,” Harvard Business School case no. 611-045 (Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2011).
7. D. Sull and C. Sull, “The Real Issues Driving the Nursing Crisis,” MIT Sloan Management Review 65, no. 2 (winter 2024): 76-83.
8. E.L. Kelly and P. Moen, “Fixing the Overload Problem at Work,” MIT Sloan Management Review 64, no. 4 (summer 2020): 48-54. For more details on Kelly and Moen’s study, see P. Moen, E.L. Kelly, W. Fan, et al., “Does a Flexibility/Support Organizational Initiative Improve High-Tech Employees’ Well-Being? Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network,” American Sociological Review 81, no. 1 (February 2016): 134-164.
9. M. Angelici and P. Profeta, “Smart Working: Work Flexibility Without Constraints,” Management Science 70, no. 3 (March 2024): 1680-1705.
10. S. Kesavan, S.J. Lambert, J.C. Williams, et al., “Doing Well by Doing Good: Improving Retail Store Performance With Responsible Scheduling Practices at the Gap, Inc.,” Management Science 68, no. 11 (November 2022): 7818-7836.
11. L.H. Aiken, W. Sermeus, K. Van den Heede, et al., “Patient Safety, Satisfaction, and Quality of Hospital Care: Cross Sectional Surveys of Nurses and Patients in 12 Countries in Europe and the United States,” The BMJ 344 (March 2012): 1-14.
12. C. Kwon, A. Raman, and J. Tamayo, “Human-Computer Interactions in Demand Forecasting and Labor Scheduling Decisions,” SSRN, April 15, 2024, https://papers.ssrn.com.
13. E.E. Kossek, M.M. Piszczek, K.L. McAlpine, et al., “Filling the Holes: Work Schedulers as Job Crafters of Employment Practice in Long-Term Health Care,” ILR Review 69, no. 4 (August 2016): 961-990.
14. E.E. Kossek, L.M. Rosokha, and C. Leana, “Work Schedule Patching in Health Care: Exploring Implementation Approaches,” Work and Occupations 47, no. 2 (May 2020): 228-261.
15. L.A. Perlow, “Boundary Control: The Social Ordering of Work and Family Time in a High-Tech Corporation,” Administrative Science Quarterly 43, no. 2 (June 1998): 328-357.
16. Kelly and Moen, “Fixing the Overload Problem.” For more details on Kelly and Moen’s study, see P. Moen, E.L. Kelly, W. Fan, et al., “Does a Flexibility/Support Organizational Initiative Improve High-Tech Employees’ Well-Being? Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network,” American Sociological Review 81, no. 1 (February 2016): 134-164.
i. C.P. Landrigan, J.M. Rothschild, J.W. Cronin, et al., “Effect of Reducing Interns’ Work Hours on Serious Medical Errors in Intensive Care Units,” New England Journal of Medicine 351, no. 18 (Oct. 28, 2004): 1838-1848.
ii. B.E. Christensen, N.J. Newton, and M.S. Wilkins, “How Do Team Workloads and Team Staffing Affect the Audit? Archival Evidence From U.S. Audits,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 92 (July 2021): 1-20.
iii. M.C. Bolino, T.K. Kelemen, and S.H. Matthews, “Working 9 to 5? A Review of Research on Nonstandard Work Schedules,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 42, no. 2 (February 2021): 188-211.
iv. A. Bergman, G. David, and H. Song, “‘I Quit’: Schedule Volatility as a Driver of Voluntary Employee Turnover,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 25, no. 4 (July-August 2023): 1416-1435.
v. C. Kwon and A. Raman, “The Effects of Inconsistent Work Schedules on Employee Lateness and Absenteeism,” SSRN, Nov. 2, 2023, https://papers.ssrn.com; and C. Kwon and R. Ananth, “The Effect of Employee Lateness and Absenteeism on Store Performance,” SSRN, Aug. 19, 2022, https://papers.ssrn.com.
vi. G. Lu, R.Y. Du, and X. Peng, “The Impact of Schedule Consistency on Shift Worker Productivity: An Empirical Investigation,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 24, no. 5 (September-October 2022): 2780-2796.
vii. E. Keating, “Excessive Hours and Fatigue Risk in the Long Island Rail Road Track Division,” report no. 2023-05, Metropolitan Transportation Authority Office of the Inspector General, New York, May 2023.
viii. K. Guyot and R.V. Reeves, “Unpredictable Work Hours and Volatile Incomes Are Long-Term Risks for American Workers,” Brookings Institution, Aug. 18, 2020, www.brookings.edu.