Topics
MIT SMR Strategy Forum
California’s new privacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), has recently gone into effect after being passed in 2018. Similar to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that went into effect in 2018 in the EU, the CCPA aims to give consumers more rights and autonomy over their data and how companies can use it. Given California’s size (it is the largest economy in the United States and the fifth largest in the world) and its central location in the technology sector — where companies like Facebook and Google are based — the privacy act will have widespread effects for businesses nationwide. For this month’s MIT SMR Strategy Forum, we dialed in to an industry at the center of many conversations around data privacy rights: targeted advertising.
We asked our panel of strategy experts to respond to the following statement:
The California Consumer Privacy Act will undermine the targeted advertising market by giving consumers the right to opt out of allowing companies to sell personal data to third parties.
■
Raw Responses
■
Responses weighted by panelists’ level of confidence
Panelists
Panelist | Vote | Confidence | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 5 | “Much depends on detection and enforcement. If the State of California does not dedicate expertise and talent to the prosecution of violations of the CCPA, then its impact could be deferred until the ...courts resolve private action. However, if resources are committed to enforcement, then the CCPA’s impact could be quite significant.”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 8 | “Many consumers will likely consent (not opt out) in return for access. Instead, the Act will provide a sounder foundation for targeted advertising.” |
|
Disagree | 7 | |
|
Agree | 8 | |
|
Agree | 3 | “It would be a good thing to reduce personalized targeted ads.” |
|
Disagree | 7 | “My guess is that there are ways to get data in any case by self-collection rather than a market. But even so, it is unclear how many consumers will opt out as a result of this law. So in the end, tar...geted advertising will likely be just fine.”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 7 | “It’s too extreme to say that the CCPA will ‘undermine’ the targeted advertising market. CCPA (and similar efforts in other states) will require targeted advertising firms to be more creative in obtai...ning data from knowledgable consumers who opt out, analogous to GDPR; these costs are likely to be passed along to advertisers and, in turn, consumers.”Read More + |
|
Strongly Disagree | 8 | “Many consumers will not bother to take advantage of these rights. Even for those who do, companies can still target their advertising based on non-identifying information, just not to the degree that... they have been able to do.”Read More + |
|
Strongly Disagree | 10 | “Not being able to sell consumer data won’t prevent companies from developing their own targeted ads.” |
|
Disagree | 8 | “The California law won’t stop Facebook significantly, and the targeted ad market has a glut of inventory. Reducing the supply may help the market by increasing prices. The law will tend to favor big ...sites that can force opt-in: Facebook, Gmail, YouTube, TikTok, Amazon, and disfavor many others, an unfortunate unintended consequence. Free sites like Facebook may need to start charging to compel opt-in.”Read More + |
|
Neither Agree nor Disagree | 5 | |
|
Agree | 7 | |
|
Neither Agree nor Disagree | 3 | “Like GDPR, the CCPA will shift targeted advertising — and involve more clicks (!) and perhaps more public information in targeting efforts — but is unlikely to significantly reduce the overall incide...nce of targeted ads over the long term.”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 6 | “There is a lot of ambiguity in this statute. Enforcement/fines are also unclear. Requires practices that most users say they want. Leaves many channels open for targeting. Do not expect we will see a...n effect for a while, if any.”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 8 | “Consumer behavior suggests that most people give away their privacy for the equivalent of a candy bar. It is very unlikely that a meaningful fraction of people actually opt out of marketing or even p...ut serious restrictions on the use of their personal data.”Read More + |
|
Disagree | 5 | “So far, experience suggests that most people do not opt in to these programs. It’s hard to see a change unless no-sale becomes the default.” |
|
Strongly Disagree | 10 | “If the targeted advertising market must rely on violating the wishes of consumers, it is very unlikely to be improving welfare. Should this cause it to fail, then good riddance.” |
About the MIT SMR Strategy Forum
Questions of strategy are universal: Every business leader must tackle a topic that’s central to how and why organizations compete. The MIT Sloan Management Review Strategy Forum offers a regular glimpse into the minds of academic leaders who have been researching and observing how businesses determine their strategy for decades.
Each month, the MIT SMR Strategy Forum poses a single question to our panel of experts in the fields of business, economics, and management. Panelists are asked to agree or disagree with a prediction, indicate their level of confidence, and provide a brief explanation for their response.
This page allows readers to engage with the results of each survey. You can see the share of panelists who agree or disagree with each prediction, how confident they feel about their answers, and the thinking behind their responses. To explore individual panelists’ thought processes about each question, click through to their voting history page. Readers can also submit their own suggestions for future topics to smr-strategy@mit.edu.
Forum Chairs
Raffaella Sadun is a professor of business administration in the Strategy unit at Harvard Business School. Professor Sadun’s research focuses on the economics of productivity, management, and organizational change. Her research documents the economic and cultural determinants of managerial choices, as well as their implications for organizational performance in both the private and public sectors (including health care and education). She tweets @raffasadun.
Timothy Simcoe is an associate professor of strategy and innovation at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business.