Social Media’s Expanding Relationship Universe

Thanks to technology, our “circles” have widened to include not just friends, family, and coworkers, but also followers, fans, and tweeps.

Reading Time: 5 min 

Topics

Social Business

Social business research and more recent thought leadership explore the challenges and opportunities presented by social media.
More in this series
Already a member?
Not a member?
Sign up today
Member
Free

5 free articles per month, $6.95/article thereafter, free newsletter.

Subscribe
$75/Year

Unlimited digital content, quarterly magazine, free newsletter, entire archive.

Sign me up

Part 2 of a 5-part series examining how social media has and will affect how organizations functions. The series is derived from a full-length article found in MIS Quarterly Executive.

Social psychologists Edward Deci and Richard Ryan from the University of Rochester contend that “relatedness” is a basic psychological need. Technology platforms that enable new ways to relate, enhance existing social capabilities, or make social networks more transparent have the potential to help meet a basic psychological need.

The ability of technology-based social networks to achieve this potential, however, depends on several factors identified by researchers studying offline social networks — proximities, interactions, relationships, and flows. Understanding these four factors and their different roles in online and offline social networks is critical to understanding the potential value of social tools within the enterprise.

Flows represent the transfer of information from one person to another. While some pre-existing connection between individuals is necessary for flows in offline networks, social media enables flows without the necessity of any previous relationship between users. A good example is Twitter hashtags or trending topics, which allow people to find and organize information around a common interest, even if they do not know each other.

These types of flows allow individuals to remotely participate in live events, such as sporting events, unfolding news stories (the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013 and the 2015 trial of the accused bomber, for instance), or awards shows. They also allow groups to organize quickly in response to an unforeseen crisis, such as when the American Red Cross used Twitter to coordinate aid in response to Hurricane Sandy. New video feed platforms, such as Periscope and Meerkat, may take these information flows to a new level.

Relationships are perhaps the most common types of connections in social networking platforms. Relationships are persistent connections that define the relationship over time — such as friend, follower, or connection. These new digital relationships typically allow individuals to more efficiently maintain a larger network of connections, because they are tapped only when needed or provide serendipitous access to information.

While we have considerable control over the definition of our nuanced relationships offline, platform designers define what a relationship consists of online.

Read the Full Article

Topics

Social Business

Social business research and more recent thought leadership explore the challenges and opportunities presented by social media.
More in this series

More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comments (2)
kabrina chang
As always, Prof. Kane, interesting and thought-provoking piece.  I wonder how long it will take for the slow pace of the law to catch up.  Facebook was sued last week for their facial recognition and tagging service.  A man in the Chicago area said their collection of data violates the Illinois Biometrics Information Privacy Act (2008) which requires the written consent of the user before companies like FB can collect and store data.  

It seems tagging would be an essential ingredient to the effectiveness of relationships, flows, and interactions you mention as the foundation for these platforms.  The use of this data by KLN is troubling on many levels (legal and ethical): could it lead to racial or ethnic profiling?  What about the privacy of the user?  The Chicago plaintiff claims that adjusting privacy settings is irrelevant because FB collects and stores the data once you are tagged regardless of your settings.  

Unfortunately for employers and others, there is a patchwork of state laws on biometric privacy from the need for search warrants, to license plate readers, to the Illinois law which covers all biometric data.  There is no federal law establishing a unified system, so it is hard to find consistent guidelines.  Another interesting intersection of lighting-quick technology and piecemeal legal development.  

See also:  http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-facebook-facial-recognition-lawsuit-met-story.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/technology/no-us-action-so-states-move-on-privacy-law.html?_r=0
Dr. Sunil Kumar Yadav
really it is very nice article which will be helpful to me for my new drafted article entitled:"Abuser Involvement & influence of social network sites to their choices in emerging economies: New evidence "