Four Habits of Highly Effective Virtual Teams

Many employees expect work-from-home to be an option. A handful of practices can help an organization succeed at its remote policy.

Reading Time: 3 min 

Topics

Already a member?
Not a member?
Sign up today
Member
Free

5 Free Articles per month, $6.95/article thereafter. Free newsletter.

Subscribe
$75/Year

Unlimited digital content, quaterly magazine, free newsletter, entire archive.

Sign me up

Employers thinking about allowing — and even encouraging — employees to work remotely are inundated with conflicting information these days.

On the one hand, employees are hungry for this valuable work/life option. In the United States, a Gallup survey and report on the state of the American workplace, released in February 2017, found that “flexible scheduling and work-from-home opportunities play a major role in an employee’s decision to take or leave a job.” Millennial professionals now expect options in their work situations: “This is a group of professionals who see flexible work as a standard way of working, rather than a perk,” Sara Sutton Fell, CEO and founder of Flexjobs Corp. of Boulder, Colorado, told U.S. News & World Report. Virtual employees in the United States report being more connected to their work: Those who were able to spend 60% to 80% of their time away from the office had the highest rates of engagement, according to a New York Times article about the Gallup survey.

But prominent companies that once embraced virtual teams have pulled back. Marissa Mayer, who banned telecommuting at Yahoo shortly after she took over as CEO in 2013, was one of the most visible managers to move away from the practice. She argued that “communication and collaboration” require people to be “working side-by-side” and available for impromptu meetings. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that Aetna, Bank of America, IBM, and Reddit have all ended or cut back on remote-work options. Ken Matos, vice president of research at Life Meets Work, a workplace consultancy based in Park Ridge, Illinois, told the Journal that companies often retreat from offering the work-from-home option during periods of turmoil and reinvention.

Maybe those companies would have had better luck with virtual teams if they’d done things differently. Managers considering the option or looking to get the most out of their current remote policy should revisit the 2009 MIT Sloan Management Review article “How to Manage Virtual Teams.” Authors Frank Siebdrat (Boston Consulting Group in Munich, Germany), Martin Hoegl, and Holger Ernst (both from the WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management in Vallendar, Germany) detail specific ways that virtual collaboration should be directed.

Among their recommendations for the do’s and don’ts of managing dispersion:

Emphasize teamwork skills.

Read the Full Article

Topics

More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comments (3)
Anastasia Stefanuk
Seems like every developer should have an opportunity to work remotely as long as this person is a self-sufficient professional. Moreover, there's a great number of tools and software (Trello, Redmine, Jira..) that helps with managing remote teams. Moreover, the lack of local professionals makes the global delivery model more and more popular each day. Though this model brings as many challenges as advantages:
https://mobilunity.com/blog/global-delivery-model-explained/
Prasanta Shee
By following above mentioned habits of Highly Effective Virtual Teams, one can successfully conduct virtual meetings. Various tools like webex, R-HUB web conferencing servers etc. are used by highly effective virtual teams for conducting virtual meetings.
James Hemsath
These 4 points on managing virtual teams are concise and extremely helpful.  Even if we are not working from home, we are working with individuals in different locations, different countries and different time zones and this is becoming more and more the norm.  I would like to comment on the fourth point on fostering a global culture.  I recently completed a two year sequential mixed methods research project looking at success factors that facilitate transnational multiparty collaboration.  As one would expect "culture" was an area of exploration and what was interesting was the role culture played.  Culture, when considered from the viewpoint of different countries, with different traditions and different ways of interacting turned out not be directly related to the work output of the team.  That aspect of culture as defined by Hofestede and the Globe Project manifested itself as a dissatisfier - that is, if you didn't pay attention and actively manage cultural differences they would get in the way of communication and trust and empathy and prevent collaboration from taking place.

What the 4th habit of fostering a global culture truly is speaking to creating an identity that is singular in terms of what you want to create as a team, yet maintains and takes advantage of individual expertise and the cultures the individuals are from, never trying to submerge anyone's individual-ness into one homogenous entity.  You accomplish this by hiring folks with high degrees of cultural intelligence, which can be as simple as a true interest in learning from and experiencing different cultures.  This takes time and intent, especially from a virtual perspective, but in the end provides the results that only a varied and motivated team can provide.