How Workplace Fairness Affects Employee Commitment

New research offers insights into the effects that fair procedures and outcomes — or a lack of them — have on employees’ commitment to an organization.

Reading Time: 8 min 

Topics

Buy
Already a member?
Not a member?
Sign up today
Member
Special Offer

Members get 60 days free site access, $6.95/article thereafter. Free newsletter.

Subscriber
$75/Year

Unlimited digital content, quaterly magazine, free newsletter, entire archive.

Sign me up

What makes workers feel engaged? The quest to answer this riddle is becoming increasingly important for organizations, because employee engagement is linked to work performance: Engaged employees tend to be more productive. Moreover, workplace engagement is an important determinant for the level of commitment and loyalty that employees show toward their respective organizations. Executives must understand what motivates employees to excel in their jobs to reduce the risk of “brain drain” and, ultimately, to create sustainable organizational success.

One of the crucial prerequisites for workforce well-being is that employees feel they can trust their line managers. Trust in decision-making authorities fundamentally shapes employees’ expectations about how they will be treated in the future — in terms of both what the authorities are likely to do and how they will execute their decisions. The more trust employees have in their managers, the more likely the employees are to expect organizational outcomes to be favorable and the more likely they are to expect that the procedures used by authorities to plan and implement decisions will be fair.

However, at least one study found that for many workers, interacting with their line manager is the least pleasant moment of the day. This is problematic, because a prominent research finding in the domain of social psychology suggests that people tend to perceive and respond to decisions in ways that are consistent with their prior expectations. That finding suggests that employees who expect their line managers to be untrustworthy are more likely to be disloyal toward the organization and exhibit lower levels of motivation, which may ultimately result in suboptimal work performance. Moreover, the relationship between workers’ trust in decision-making authorities and their commitment toward the organization is a self-perpetuating one: According to several studies, untrusting employees who show a low level of commitment are likely to be treated less positively by their superiors, which in turn discourages the employees from being more committed. In other words, employees who show low commitment as a result of not trusting management are often caught in a vicious cycle.

Our research offers insights into the specific types of workplace behaviors that may give rise to such cycles as well as behaviors that can allow managers to exit them.

Read the Full Article

Topics

Reprint #:

57201

More Like This

Add a comment

You must to post a comment.

First time here? Sign up for a free account: Comment on articles and get access to many more articles.

Comment (1)
Eric Nordstrom
I'm not sure if I concur with the words used within this article "fairness" has a particular stench to it, but I can say the despite the lexicon, the article is near to spot on. At my company, http://www.midgardscientific.com Employee Engagement is largely attained by forging bonds through difficulty. The spirit of ownership of a process, a title, a job is enacted by ensuring there is adequate support for perseverance. Similar to the bonds created in war, as Army buddies remain long term friend for life, accomplishment through adversity with your fellow employees is always the way to go. Line managers who do not lead the charge and integrate their human resources are indeed the lead cause of diminished morale. This is why upper management must lead by example.