What to Read Next
Already a member?Sign in
A global automotive company entered the mainland China market following what it thought were the rules. Executives knew gifts were an important personal gesture and integral to Chinese business etiquette. They also knew that success in Chinese business culture was as much about whom you know as what you know.
To make the right connections, the company sponsored events and hosted lavish dinner parties to cultivate personal ties, including the all-important guanxi (commonly defined as personal connections between people doing business). Several years later, the company faced the fact that its efforts were producing minimal results.
As they tried to discover why, executives learned that despite all their efforts, the company had actually acquired a bad reputation among potential Chinese industry partners. The potential partners had come to view the company as a seeker of short-term transactional opportunities wrapped in expensive entertainment.
The Chinese executives the company had carefully courted socially now viewed it as a source of free entertainment — a perk they came to expect with every interaction. Even worse, the potential Chinese partners had developed the impression that the company had few compelling business propositions to offer since it didn’t seem to be focused on doing business. Although the company knew the people it needed to know, like many other companies eager to gain a foothold in China, it had failed in its efforts to build critical relationships —and as a result, its business initiatives failed too.
The Myths of Guanxi
In our studies of intercultural relationships between Chinese and Western executives, my colleagues and I discovered that a fundamental misconception has arisen about guanxi. Experts line up to sell Western executives courses, websites, books and articles that promise to help them build guanxi. But the advice rarely strays beyond superficial notions of family and friendship and tips about such things as keeping business cards out of one’s back pocket. Although there is an enormous focus on building relationships, there is little understanding of what makes them actually work.
The prevailing thinking about guanxi falls into two traps. First, it doesn’t recognize that the business environment in China is changing.
Read the Full ArticleAlready a subscriber? Sign in
1. R.Y.J. Chua, P. Ingram and M.W. Morris, “From the Head and the Heart: Locating Cognition- and Affect-Based Trust in Managers’ Professional Networks,” Academy of Management Journal 51, no. 3 (2008): 436-452.
2. R.Y.J. Chua, M.W. Morris and P. Ingram, “Guanxi vs. Networking: Distinctive Configurations of Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust in the Networks of Chinese vs. American Managers,” Journal of International Business Studies 40, no. 3 (2009): 490-508.
3. C.X. Jiang, R.Y.J. Chua, M. Kotabe and J.Y. Murray, “Effects of Cultural Ethnicity, Firm Size, and Firm Age on Senior Executives’ Trust in Their Overseas Partners: Evidence From China,” Journal of International Business Studies 42, no. 9 (2011): 1150-1173.
i. R.Y.J. Chua, S. Chen and L.B. Kwan, “CDG: Managing in China’s Economic Transformation,” Harvard Business School case no. 411-067 (Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2010).
ii. R.Y.J. Chua, M.W. Morris and S. Mor, “Collaborating Across Cultures: Cultural Metacognition and Affect-Based Trust in Creative Collaboration,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 118, no. 2 (July 2012): 116-131.